Artificial Intelligence has really advanced over the years. While it was just a tool and an efficiency enhancer in the past, it is now a tremendous creator that produces new and revolutionary solutions in many domains. This ranges from a very long list of applications such as inventing new pharmaceutical compounds, inventing new industrial processes, and even the development of art that is creative and imaginative. The current AI systems, with their more sophisticated algorithms and learning capabilities, have now gone beyond the ingenuity and creative thinking that human beings could ever provide in many cases. This drastic change, however, raises a very pertinent question: if an AI produces an invention independently without the intervention of human beings, who should receive the credit for inventing the creation.

With such rapid growth of AI-based industries in India, this issue has exposed a significant deficiency in the legal framework. The Patents Act, 1970, specifies conditions for grant patents novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability while considering the applicant as a human. Therefore, this presumption has created uncertainty and possibly led to exclusion of AI-generated inventions from protection. This may prevent Indian enterprises from flourishing and reduce its competitiveness in the global world in the changing AI-driven landscape.

This blog discusses some of the issues surrounding AI-generated inventions and patents in India, examines international practices, especially the case of DABUS, and proposes several possible ways to address the emerging issue .

Understanding AI-Generated Inventions

AI-generated inventions are outputs that an artificial intelligence system produces on its own, often with little human input. The inventions usually come from complex machine learning models scanning vast datasets, identifying patterns, and suggesting solutions or designs that might never cross a human's mind. For example, DABUS, an AI system, has produced inventions such as a unique food container design and a novel emergency beacon.

Things become complex when such inventions come under the Indian patent regime. Under the Patents Act of 1970, it was emphasized that patents should always satisfy the three pillars of patentability, namely, novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. In most cases, these criteria are met, but the problem is encountered on the issue of inventorship. Can an artificial entity of this nature be given inventorship, or should this title be assigned to the human operator.

Unless these questions are addressed, India will risk landing with a legal vacuum that discourages investment in AI innovation and limits the growth of AI-driven industries.

[Image Sources: Shutterstock]

Legal Challenges in India

India's current patent laws are not prepared to handle the complexities of inventions generated by AI. A number of legal questions arise

Inventorship

The current law presumes an inventor to be a natural person and requires his name and address in the patent application. An autonomous AI system such as DABUS cannot fulfill this requirement. This poses a question: should inventorship be assigned to the AI, the developer, or the user of the system.

Ownership

Another highly controversial issue is who rights to the ownership of inventions developed using AI shall be awarded to-the developer or programmer, the organization which owns it, or to the provider of data? This introduces confusion and leads to complex commercialization as well as probable litigations.

Inventive Step

Artificial intelligence systems often rely on existing information to create new output. Patent law requires that an inventive feature must not be obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the pertinent field. What techniques might we use to determine whether an AI-created invention satisfies this condition, especially when the mechanism involves computational reasoning rather than human creativity.

Ethical and economic concerns

Such recognition would shift the balance of innovation towards large corporations possessing advanced AI technologies and thereby bringing the independent inventors and smaller firms into the background. The concentration of innovation would further intensify existing imbalances in the innovation environment. These problems require an immediate legal overhauling to address the uniqueness of AI-created inventions while providing fair access to innovation.

DABUS: A Case Study in Global Practices

International debate on the inventorship of AI is presently centered around DABUS, an AI system. DABUS's patent applications for unique food container and flashing emergency beacon have generated different reactions from patent offices worldwide, hence pointing out how different people approach AI-generated inventions

South Africa

South Africa was the first country to issue a patent that listed DABUS as the inventor. This decision was groundbreaking because it recognized the role of AI in innovation. However, the ruling did not make any statement on ownership rights and ethics, which was one of the criticisms of this decision for not having complete guidelines .

Australia

The Australian court initially allowed the listing of DABUS as the inventor, which indeed recognized that AI could, on its own, invent novel solutions. However, the Federal Court overturned this judgment, pointing out that only natural persons can be counted as inventors under the Australian law .

United Kingdom and European Union

The UK Intellectual Property Office and the European Patent Office (EPO) rejected DABUS-related applications, stating that an inventor must be a natural person. In these jurisdictions, humans who have participated in developing or deploying the AI system can claim inventorship, as long as they significantly contribute to the innovation process .

United States

The USPTO also rejected applications related to DABUS, arguing that the term "inventor" in US patent law refers only to natural persons.

India can learn from these jurisdictions how to balance the need to recognize AI-driven innovation while addressing concerns around ownership, accountability, and equity .

Implications for India’s Innovation Ecosystem

AI-generated inventions are going to revolutionize India's industrial and technological world, especially in health, agriculture, and manufacturing. Without a clear legal framework that addresses the recognition and protection of such inventions, there is great risk involved

Startups and SMEs

Small and medium-sized enterprises and startups depend on innovation to compete in the market. If AI-generated inventions are not protected, these companies will lose their competitive advantage and may even stifle innovation in India's startup ecosystem.

Investor Confidence

Investors are unlikely to invest in projects where intellectual property rights are unclear. The uncertainty surrounding AI-generated inventions may discourage investments in AI research and development, which is critical for India's progress.

Global Competitiveness

As South Korea, Japan, and China build AI-friendly IP regimes, India will be left behind in the global innovation race. A strong legal framework for inventions generated by AI is important to keep India at par with the rest of the world.

Technological Self-Reliance

The "Make in India" and "Aatmanirbhar Bharat" initiatives are dependent on building domestic technological capabilities. Patent guidelines for inventions generated by AI will be important for supporting these initiatives and achieving technological self-reliance .

Recommendations for a Robust Framework

To overcome these issues, India needs to be forward-thinking

Amend Patent Laws

Patent laws in India need to broaden the definition of an "inventor" to include AI systems. Alternatively, provisions may be made that allow human collaborators or operators to be granted inventorship if they play a key role in guiding the innovation of the AI.

Create Ownership Laws

Clear guidelines must be set to define ownership rights of inventions generated by AI. The rules must consider the roles of AI developers, owners, and users in the innovation process .

Foster Collaboration

Government and industry partnerships can help develop policies that align with the needs of innovators while addressing legal and ethical concerns. Collaboration can bridge the gap between technology and law.

Participate in Global Discussions

India should engage proactively in international discussions on AI and intellectual property to harmonize its policies with global standards and contribute to shaping international frameworks for AI-driven innovation.

Raise Awareness

Public awareness campaigns and educational initiatives can help stakeholders understand the importance of AI-generated inventions and the need for legal reforms to address this emerging issue.

Conclusion

AI-generated inventions have fundamentally disrupted traditional concepts of inventorship and intellectual property, challenging long-standing legal and ethical frameworks. The Indian nation stands at a crossroads as artificial intelligence emerges as a leading driver of innovation. Decisions taken today about whether and how to recognize AI as an inventor will have far-reaching implications for the nation's technological and economic future.

If India addresses the current legal ambiguities surrounding AI-generated inventions and learns from global practices, such as the controversial DABUS case, it can position itself as a leader in the AI revolution. A forward-looking and adaptable patent framework will be crucial to ensure that innovation continues to thrive in the age of AI. This includes reevaluating traditional patent laws, fostering collaboration between policymakers and stakeholders, and embracing a more inclusive definition of inventorship that accommodates advancements in technology while maintaining the human-centric essence of intellectual property. A balanced approach will unlock AI-driven innovation fully, with India competing more effectively globally. Such an approach will not only enhance the reputation of this country as the hub of cutting-edge technology but will also create a space that is fair and sustainable in nature. Thus, ensuring the rights of innovators-whether human or machine-assisted-and integrating ethics into the patent system can pave the way for fair growth in India.

Apart from this, clear policies with an ecosystem that will inspire AI innovation will attract foreign investment and talent towards further deepening India's position as one of the key players in the global AI economy.

As AI reshapes industries and redefines how problems are solved, there's a unique opportunity for India to craft a robust, fair, and inclusive intellectual property framework that balances innovation with fairness and economic growth. With proactive measures and a vision for the future, India can lead the way in creating an IP regime that reflects the realities of the AI-driven world while ensuring long-term benefits for society as a whole.

Author : BHUMI SHARMA, in case of any query, contact us at Global Patent Filing or write back us via email at support@globalpatentfiling.com.