How Patent Laws Safeguard Innovations Across Borders
Categories:
A patent protects an invention by allowing its inventor, or the groups who own the patent control over who may use the patent. It protects inventions that are non-obvious, useful, and novel. This includes a broad spectrum of inventions such as Technological Inventions, Chemical Compositions, Biotechnological Innovations, and Design and Plant Patents. In India, patents are generally valid for 20 years from filing the patent application. This period is relevant to most patents, including those for inventions. However, to maintain the validity of a patent throughout this period, the patent holder must pay annual maintenance fees to the Indian Patent Office. For pharmaceutical products, there can be a patent term extension under certain conditions, including regulatory delays in obtaining marketing approval. But this only extends the patent for so long and is rarely applied.
Patent protection across various countries is an essential element for companies to expand their businesses across the globe in today's globalized world. It protects innovations from use by others, thereby making it possible for companies to enter new markets with confidence, monetize their creations, and retain a competitive advantage. Moreover, strong patent rights encourage innovation because research and development investments become more attractive in the knowledge that intellectual property is protected in regions.
International agreements like the Patent Cooperation Treaty and the Paris Convention make getting patents around the world relatively easier, thus reducing the administrative and legal complexities of obtaining patents. These also prevent infringement and counterfeiting, especially with the crossing of borders of products and technologies. Patents also promote international cooperation by providing a standard basis for the protection of intellectual property and opportunities for licensing agreements, through which companies can expand their businesses without heavy investment in manufacturing or distribution. Global issues such as climate change and healthcare spur innovation, and international patent protection ensure that these solutions can be implemented globally.
To get a patent, an invention must fulfill some basic requirements. It must be new. That simply means it cannot be something that is already in the public domain or has been used before. It must also be non-obvious. That means the invention cannot be something that anyone with general knowledge in the field can easily think of. Moreover, creation has to be useful—if it solves a problem and brings some benefit in fact; an idea in a theory is nothing. Furthermore, the creator of the invention has to show how to work the latter, clearly, so it is obvious for other people to understand, reproduce, etc. Finally, the thing invented has to be capable of being patented and should not be an abstract idea or a natural phenomenon.
Having a patent has many significant benefits to the inventor. It can give the inventor exclusive rights to make, use, and sell his invention for about 20 years. No other can legally copy such an invention. The inventions can also be monetized through licensing, whereby people use the invention for a fee, thereby being a good source of revenue. A patent provides an inventor with a competitive advantage because no one else is allowed to use the same idea, which gives him an edge in the market. It also attracts investment since it shows investors that the company has something unique. Patents also serve as a way of protection against lawsuits since they are used as a defense if someone else tries to claim the same idea. In a high-tech or pharmaceutical industry, patents give more value to a company, hence making it more desirable as a business. Finally, patents stimulate further innovation since they present exclusive rights to inventors that would push them to continue innovating new ideas. Here, national and international patent protection primarily differ in scope, process, and jurisdiction.
Jurisdiction, filing processes, examination, costs, duration, and enforcement are markedly different for national and international patent protections. A national patent emanates from a particular nation and is enforceable only within that country's borders. At variance, countries have different patent laws and procedures; therefore, if one wants protection in several countries, then applications must be made separately in each of the desired countries. By these means, international patent protection does not yield a world patent. Instead, conventions like the Patent Cooperation Treaty make it easier to obtain patents in several countries. Through the patent cooperation treaty, an application is made to one national office; this application then becomes the basis for filing patents in different countries.
[Image Sources: Shutterstock]
National patents require separate filings at the patent office of the country that called for protection. Global protection means separate filing applications in each country, consuming time and escalating expenditure. The PCT system allows filing one application with a national office, and thereby, with that application, one can apply for protection in other countries. This work, done in the beginning, saves time and effort.
In terms of examination, your application would be evaluated under the specific patent laws of a particular country. That is an international search under the PCT system, but a formal examination is then performed by every national or regional office in which patent protection is sought. Cost is another issue. If one were to file individually, the cost might increase with translations, filing fees, and other troublesome logistical annoyances of handling many applications. The next thing is the cost factor, which generally tends to be cheaper in the PCT system at an early stage because it offers a selection of where to file in various countries later. This is where the cost heap up, particularly early enough entering the national phase and filing in individual countries.
The Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) is an international agreement designed to simplify the securing of patent protection in multiple countries. Instead of filing individual applications in each country, inventors can submit one unified application through the PCT, saving time and resources. There are fee reductions available for certain applicants such as applicants who file electronically, applicants from developing countries, and applicants from least developed countries. The Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property provides a framework for protecting intellectual property, including patents, trademarks, and designs, across its member nations. It ensures that inventors can claim priority rights, making it easier to expand into international markets. The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), a specialized agency of the United Nations, plays a central role in managing the global intellectual property system. WIPO facilitates international cooperation, ensuring that intellectual property rights are upheld across borders. Together, these agreements and organizations make it easier for inventors to safeguard their creations worldwide, fostering a global environment that supports innovation, creativity, and cross-border collaboration.
There are also numerous current and emerging challenges in enforcing patent rights as Patent laws vary greatly from country to country dictating separate jurisdictions for different rules and procedures even to the extent of dissimilar requirements for patentability in those countries. Such varying laws can bring catastrophe for inventors trying to protect their patents in every nook and corner of the world since the inventors are required to very well navigate through each country's law system to successfully acquire valid patents. Enforcement of patent rights in countries with weak intellectual protection involves Herculean efforts. Patent defense around the globe may be retrogressively joined with weak and undeveloped legal systems with poor enforcement processes. This creates an atmosphere wherein patents reinforce the convoluted chain of preventing others from using and copying their ideas without the permission of the former. With limited resources and mutable legal practices, it does not help inventors that they are also confronted by the very real risk of having their intellectual property exploited in one form or another with no assurance of recourse.
Obtaining patent protection in several nations continues to be equally tedious and costly. Each country has its envisaged laws and requirements that make the application process fearful. A few patents even require translation into languages different from the one in which they were originally defined-for instance, their redrafting according to the specific jurisdictions. The cost involved tends to cause serious financial burdens on small businesses and start-ups that otherwise may have had limited financial resources. To some extent, it also implicitly reflects the necessity of the companies for protecting their ideas in broader international markets; hence countless companies face big trouble with the financial and administrative burden attendant to patent filings across the various nations. Innovation and trade on an international scale need patents.
Patents build a monopoly on the use of innovation, providing the inventor with the incentive to disclose technology and ideas and reinforcing the confidence of companies that, as they enter new markets, their innovations are protected. As a result of just several advantageous functions, the overwhelming majority of corporations across the spectrum-from technology companies such as Apple to pharmaceutical firms like Pfizer-are employing patent laws as bulwarks against the infringement of their procedures or products. Patents can also enable a firm to license ideas and enter new markets, which generates revenues and enhances its international standing. Patent systems are also indicative of fair competition. They protect the inventors of their inventions from copying and allow them to expand their novelty with due encouragement. When the company accepts that the innovation it made will be treated by it as a monopoly, then it is very likely that the company will spend on research development. In other words, the patent system rewards creativity, rewarding it with exclusivity for a certain period. New ideas could scale competition and rejuvenate economic health.
International patent systems are crucial in protecting innovations by giving inventors exclusive rights over their creations. They have intellectual property across borders, allowing inventors to control their inventions across several nations. For instance, international conventions such as the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and the Paris Convention allow inventors to seek their patent protection coverage on a global scale by filing a single application covering multiple countries. This will allow inventors to protect their patents from any infringement, which builds the confidence of various companies for venturing into several markets.
In India, the second-most populous country in the world, the impetus for patent regimes has never been greater than it is right now; indeed, there has been an upsurge in the role of patents as part of its serious intellectual property enhancement process. Membership of the PCT and Paris Convention allows Indian inventors to file for international and worldwide protection of their rights. India has since been seriously working through the years to further enhance IP law in India, being consistent with its intercontinental counterparts. Such measures have buoyed a good sentiment for developing innovations in India in technology, pharmaceuticals, and green energy. The Indian government has completed several initiatives to examine enforcement against infringement-like issues. Within this respect, moving toward protection remains doubtful.
As innovation becomes increasingly globalized, patent systems are required to become robust and uniform in protecting inventions. Strong global patent systems create an atmosphere conducive to research and development investment, and fair competition, and ensure that creators are deriving benefits from their creations. This creates an enabling environment for innovation and fosters new ideas to grow with ease, which means businesses would develop in the international market. A strong patent system works as a foundation for fostering local intellectual property development and helps India maintain its competitiveness in the global market.
With the changes in the global marketplace, paradigm shifts in several areas of international patent law are awaited. The increasing relevancy of digital technologies, artificial intelligence, and biotechnological developments is expected to push the evolution of patent laws to be far more dynamic and tailored to this new age. The drive to harmonize patent systems across states might also be stronger by streamlining processes for the applicants and reducing costs for inventors. In parallel, the urgency to harmonize some patent systems might also emerge, having in focus a movement toward enhancing their legal status to allow for better protection for innovations within the context of green technology and public health. Such accelerated disentanglement will, at last, produce a demand for sound intellectual property reforms, which give prima facie protection against patent infringement, especially in a wiry enforcement setup.
Author : Shrushti Barange, in case of any query, contact us at Global Patent Filing or write back us via email at support@globalpatentfiling.com.
ENDNOTES-
i. WIPO, World Intellectual Property Organisation, https://www.wipo.int/patent-law/en/developments/intro.html
ii. Managing IP, Managing Intellectual Property, https://www.managingip.com/article/2a5bsc7vmakvohn4kh3i8/india-challenges-faced-in-the-protection-and-enforcement-of-patent-rights
iii. The Patent Act, 1970, S.3, No. 39, Acts of Parliament, 1970 ( India)
iv. The Patent Act, 1970, S.4, No. 39, Acts of Parliament, 1970 ( India)
v. India: Challenges faced in the protection and enforcement of patent rights , https://www.managingip.com/article/2a5bsc7vmakvohn4kh3i8/india-challenges-faced-in-the-protection-and-enforcement-of-patent-rights
vi. Rahul Dev, Comparative Study Between Indian & U.S. Patent Laws https://patentbusinesslawyer.com/comparative-study-between-indian-us-patent-laws/#:~:text=India's%20patent%20laws%20do%20not,process%2C%20machine%2C%20or%20product.&text=India%20also%20doesn't%20allow,U.S%2C%20Software%20patents%20are%20granted.
vii. India: Challenges faced in the protection and enforcement of patent rights , https://www.managingip.com/article/2a5bsc7vmakvohn4kh3i8/india-challenges-faced-in-the-protection-and-enforcement-of-patent-rights
viii. Rapacke Law Group, The Remarkable Benefits and Challenges of Patents for Software, https://arapackelaw.com/patents/pros-cons-patents-for-software/