Introduction

Nanotechnology is one of those paramount changes in this modern world where technology is changing faster with its unbelievable rhythm. The science deals with an exceptionally minute size ranging from 1 to 100 nanometres, where one nanometre signifies one billionth part of a meter. The nanoscale's accuracy and control could offer unexpected opportunities in fields ranging from medicine to agriculture. But, like any disrupting technology, nanotechnology presents some unique challenges, especially when considering intellectual property and patent laws. The blog highlights some of the subtleties of those challenges, and how the current legal approach seriously lags behind rapid technological development and alarm either to slow down innovation or to compromise public safety.

The Promises and Potential of Nanotechnology

Nanotechnology is not just another technological advancement; it's a whole different paradigm concerning how we understand and manipulate matter. At this nanoscale, the properties of materials are so much different from those in bulk form, hence enabling the fabrication of new devices, materials, and techniques applicable across various industries. Examples include the use of nanotechnology in medicine for the development of targeted drug delivery systems able to treat diseases more precisely and with fewer side effects. In electronics, it enables smaller and more powerful devices, while in agriculture, this technology promises more efficient resource use and increased crop yields.

Patent protection is one of the most significant ways of protecting nanotechnology inventions, considering its wide applicability range. The protection of patents guarantees intellectual property to researchers and inventors as well as profit in monetary form from efforts made in their names. This, in turn, encourages further investment in R&D and drives technological progress.

The Territorial Nature of Patent Rights

In general, one of the elementary tenets of patent rights is that such rights are territorial. A patent issued in one country can be enforced only within the geographical territory of such a country. This poses a major problem for inventors of nanotechnology, as most often their products and processes may have global applications. For this category of inventors to have protection across borders, they will have to apply for protection in each country of interest. This might be a tedious and expensive process, considering the complexities of patenting nanotechnology.

Besides, the territorial landscape of patents may mean that an innovation could be patented in one country and not in another, thus creating areas of ambiguity that may be manipulated by competitors. In a field as fiercely fierce and fast-changing as nanotechnology, that could have grave consequences for innovators and investors alike.

Challenges in Patenting Nanotechnology

Nanotechnology innovations are interdisciplinary, often assimilating aspects of chemistry, physics, biology, and engineering. This gives rise to huge challenges in seeking patent protection for such reorganization. The most significant among these is the insufficient ability to content the traditional patentability requirements of novelty, non-obviousness, and industrial application.

1. Novelty: Nanotechnology has wide and cross-sector applications, the determination of whether a particular invention is novel may be hard to conclude. Most of the nanotechnology inventions usually represent an increase in the pre-existing technologies, establishing the degree of novelty that may be necessary for patent protection is quite hard.

2. Non-obviousness: Another barrier is that of non-obviousness. Much of nanotechnology involves taking known principles and applying them in new ways or at different scales. Equally, one can question the invention for being genuinely non-evident to a person skilled in the relevant art. Its multidisciplinary nature further complicates this assessment in that it may require expertise across more than one domain.

3. Industrial Applicability: The requirement for industrial applicability is generally more readily satisfied, as most nanotechnology creations are readily seen to have commercial potential. The real challenge is manifesting that the invention can be scaled up from the benchtop to industrial production effectively and reliably. This is not necessarily easy, given the unique securities taken on by materials at the nanoscale.

4. Lack of Standardized terminology: The regulation is so new that there is not as yet any universally agreed-on vocabulary for describing nanomaterials and nanoprocesses. This may result in inconsistencies in patent applications and hence make it hard for patent examiners to assess an invention for novelty and non-obviousness.

The Role of TRIPS and the Patent Act

The basic international legal framework regulating patent rights is the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). According to Article 27(1) of the TRIPS Agreement, “Patents shall be available for any inventions, whether products or processes, in all fields of technology, provided they are new, involve an inventive step, and are capable of industrial application.” Further, this provision applies to nanotechnology just like it does to other areas.

[Image Sources: Shutterstock]

However, there is yet no complete agreement on what represents an "inventive step," what is "new," and what is "capable of industrial application." The lack of such uniformity creates uncertainty for nanotechnology innovators who would seek patent protection in more than one country. It also creates concern about the potential for "patent thickets" overlapping patents that form a thicket of IP rights dense enough to hinder rather than encourage innovation. Article 2(1)(j) of the Patents Act, 2005 (Amendment) defines an "invention" as a new product or process involving an inventive step capable of industrial application. However, as with TRIPS, the interpretation of these terms can vary, leading to challenges in patenting nanotechnology innovations in India.

Nanobiotechnology: A Degrading Effect on the Environment

Nanobiotechnology encompasses the utilization of nanotechnology in biological systems, thus representing most of the intricacy that comes with patenting nanotechnology. It has enormous possibilities for enhancing health, agriculture, and environmental sustainability. On the other hand, it raises some pertinent concerns regarding its safe use and the effects it would have on the environment.

1. Environmental Damage: One major issue associated with nanobiotechnology is environmental destruction. Nanoparticles are minuscule and highly reactive; hence they can interact with ecosystems in unpredictable ways. For example, they may biomagnify in water or soil leading to long-term ecological damage. This poses questions about who should be liable among patent holders for their inventions’ ecological impacts.

2. Nanotoxicity: It refers to the idea that nanoparticles can harm human health. Due to their high permeation potential, there’s a possibility that many human beings may ingest them very easily and such compounds would cause negative consequences. For instance, some nanoparticles have been linked with oxidative stress thereby causing inflammation as well as harming DNA itself among others raising ethical concerns on whether products of nanobiotechnology are safe enough and if existing regulations are adequate.

The Role of Section 3(d) in Preventing Frivolous Patents

In the case of India, therefore, Section 3(d) of the Patent Act, 2005 (Amendment), prevents frivolous patents in that the mere discovery of a new form of a known substance that does not result in the enhancement of the known efficacy of that substance is excluded from patentability. This becomes relevant in the case of nanotechnology since the minor modifications in the existing technologies may not meet the threshold for patentability.

By that, for instance, the mere fact of retaining nanomaterial cannot be enough to grant a patent to an already established drug, unless it is proved that the new form has radically brought a therapeutic advantage. Thereby ensuring that only genuinely innovative and useful invention receives patent protection, not handing the key to enterprises utilizing a trivial modification

The Future of Nanotechnology and Patents

With the advancement of nanotechnology, the difficulties in patenting these inventions will further be aggravated. It is a multidisciplinary field lacking unified terminology leading to unclear patent laws in addition to possible risks posed to health and the environment.

This can only be resolved by increasing international collaboration and harmonization of patent legislation. Such measures would include formulating an all-encompassing vocabulary for nanotechnology, as well as deciding on parameters like inventiveness, novelty, and utility. In addition, specific regulations on environmental risks and nanotoxicity, unique to nanotechnology may need to be established.

Thus, while it is necessary for patents aimed at safeguarding novelties and financial investments made into nanotechnology by researchers, the existing legal structure is incapable of addressing the unique predicaments in this fast-growing industry. As technology progresses a compromise has to be reached between encouraging innovation and safeguarding public health together with ecological protection systems. Therefore, this not only calls for amendments to the current patent laws but also a fresh perspective on our intellectual property approach in light of nanotechnology.

Author : Shruti Gupta, in case of any query, contact us at Global Patent Filing or write back us via email at support@globalpatentfiling.com.

References

1. Ali, A. and Sinha, K., 2014. Exploring the opportunities and challenges in nanotechnology innovation in India. J. Soc. Sci. Poli. Imp, 2(2), pp.227-251.

2. Jain, A., Hallihosur, S. and Rangan, L., 2011. Dynamics of nanotechnology patenting: An Indian scenario. Technology in Society, 33(1-2), pp.137-144.

3. Ali, A. and Sinha, K., 2015. Challenges and prospects of patent regime in nanotechnology development in India. Nanotech. L. & Bus., 12, p.173.

4. Medeiros-Neves, B., Nemitz, M. C., Silveira Fachel, F. N., & Teixeira, H. F. (2019). Recent Patents Concerning the use of Nanotechnology-based Delivery Systems as Skin Penetration Enhancers. Recent patents on drug delivery & formulation, 13(3), 192–202. https://doi.org/10.2174/1872211313666191024112137